Comparison Guide

EOT vs Employee Benefit Trust (EBT)

Employee Ownership Trusts and Employee Benefit Trusts are often confused, but they sit under different legal frameworks and are used for different purposes. This guide explains the statutory distinction, the tax treatment, and how UK business owners typically use each vehicle.

The short answer

An Employee Ownership Trust (EOT) is a specific statutory structure introduced by the Finance Act 2014. It exists to hold a controlling interest in a trading company for the benefit of all eligible employees, and it unlocks a defined set of tax reliefs when the qualifying conditions are met.

An Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) is a broader trust vehicle that has been used in the UK for decades to deliver employee benefits — typically minority share awards, deferred bonuses, or funding for incentive schemes. An EBT can hold shares, cash, or other assets, but it does not require a controlling interest and does not attract the specific statutory reliefs that apply to EOTs.

In short: every EOT is a form of employee benefit trust in general terms, but not every EBT is an EOT. The statutory tests, tax outcomes, and typical use cases are different.

2026 statutory update: Following the Finance Act 2026, qualifying disposals to an EOT attract 50% Capital Gains Tax relief — an effective CGT rate of 12% for higher-rate taxpayers. Disposals to a general EBT do not attract this relief.

EOT vs EBT at a glance

A structural comparison across the tests and treatments that matter most in UK practice.

Factor	Employee Ownership Trust (EOT)	Employee Benefit Trust (EBT)
Statutory basis	Statutory structure introduced by the Finance Act 2014 (schedule 37), sitting within a specific HMRC framework for majority employee ownership.	General trust vehicle recognised under employment and trust law, used flexibly for a wide range of employee benefit and incentive purposes.
Primary purpose	Transferring a controlling interest in the trading company to a trust held for the benefit of all eligible employees.	Delivering employee benefits — often minority share awards, cash bonuses, share option arrangements, or funding wider incentive plans.
Ownership threshold	Trust must hold more than 50% of the ordinary share capital and voting rights. Controlling-interest test is central.	No ownership threshold. The trust may hold a small percentage of shares, or none, depending on how it is used.
Beneficiary group	All eligible employees must benefit on the same terms, subject to permitted equality-based factors (remuneration, length of service, hours worked).	Beneficiary class may be defined more selectively — for example, senior management, specific teams, or option holders.
Tax position on sale (seller)	Qualifying disposals to an EOT attract 50% Capital Gains Tax relief for disposals on or after 26 November 2025 (Finance Act 2026). Effective CGT rate of 12% for higher-rate taxpayers.	No equivalent statutory CGT relief for the seller. Normal capital gains rules apply on disposal of shares to an EBT.
Employee bonus treatment	Company can pay income tax-free bonuses of up to £3,600 per employee per year (National Insurance still applies), provided statutory conditions are met.	No equivalent statutory bonus exemption. Payments from an EBT are typically taxed as employment income under PAYE.
Typical use case	Founder or majority shareholder succession into employee ownership as an alternative to a trade sale, MBO, or PE exit.	Employee share schemes, deferred bonus arrangements, funding EMI or unapproved options, or holding shares for incentive purposes.
Governance	Trustee board (corporate or individual) with statutory and fiduciary duties to act in the interests of employees collectively.	Trustees exercise powers under the trust deed. Governance is shaped by the deed and general trust law rather than a statutory EOT framework.
Disqualifying events	Statutory disqualifying events can trigger clawback of relief — for example, loss of controlling interest or breach of the equality requirement.	Not subject to the EOT disqualifying-event regime. Tax risks arise from disguised remuneration and general anti-avoidance rules.
Anti-avoidance exposure	Governed by the EOT statutory conditions and HMRC guidance in the Capital Gains manual and Employee Ownership manual.	Historically scrutinised under the disguised remuneration rules (Part 7A ITEPA 2003) where used to route rewards to individual employees.

When each structure is typically used

When an EOT is the right route

A founder or majority shareholder wants to exit and pass the business to its workforce.
The company can realistically fund deferred consideration from future trading cash flows.
The seller values continuity, culture, and independence over an outright trade sale.
The shareholder wants to access the statutory CGT relief on a qualifying disposal.
The company wants to introduce the £3,600 income tax-free bonus regime for employees.

When an EBT is more appropriate

A company wants to run a share incentive or deferred bonus arrangement for a defined group.
Shares are to be held for future option exercises (EMI, CSOP, or unapproved options).
Majority ownership is not intended to transfer to employees as a whole.
The trust is a warehousing or funding vehicle within a wider reward strategy.
The commercial goal is targeted retention or reward, not succession.

Common questions and confusions

Is an EOT just a type of EBT?

An EOT is a specific statutory sub-set of trust structure. It must meet the controlling-interest requirement, the all-employee benefit requirement, and the equality requirement set out in the Finance Act 2014. A general EBT does not have to meet any of these tests. The two are not interchangeable.

Can the same trust do both jobs?

In practice, no. An EOT is designed and structured specifically to satisfy the statutory conditions for CGT relief and the tax-free bonus regime. Using an EOT as a general incentive vehicle risks breaching the equality requirement or the all-employee benefit requirement, which can trigger clawback of relief.

Which one preserves more flexibility for the owner?

An EBT is more flexible in structure but does not deliver the seller CGT relief or the employee bonus exemption available under an EOT. An EOT is more constrained but is the only route into the statutory tax framework designed for majority employee ownership transitions.

If we already have an EBT, do we still need an EOT?

An existing EBT does not qualify a shareholder for EOT relief. Where a founder wants to sell a controlling interest into employee ownership with the benefit of the statutory CGT relief, a new EOT trust and transaction structure is required alongside — or in place of — any existing EBT.

Not sure which structure fits your situation?

We help UK business owners work out whether an EOT, a wider incentive plan, or a different route makes most sense — grounded in your numbers, not a template.

Get Feasibility Report Speak to an EOT Advisor

Related EOT resources

Continue your research with our core guides on Employee Ownership Trusts.